Building a Detection Foundation

Written By:

Brandon Allen

Date:

Nov 5, 2025

In an era defined by continuous breaches, expanding attack surfaces, and accelerating cloud adoption, many security teams face the same uncomfortable reality: they have a large number of detections, but little confidence in their detection capability. Dashboards are full, alerts are constant, and yet meaningful threats still slip through unnoticed.

At Argus Defense, we see this problem repeatedly across industries. The issue is rarely a lack of tooling or telemetry. Instead, it is the absence of a detection system.

From Alerts to Systems

Most detection environments evolve reactively. A breach leads to a new rule. A compliance requirement creates another alert. A vendor recommendation adds several more. Over time, security teams inherit a patchwork of detections that operate independently, each solving a narrow problem in isolation.

This approach creates what we refer to as a “Rube Goldberg detection machine” — overly complex, fragile, and inefficient. Alerts depend on specific conditions, brittle indicators, or historical attack patterns that attackers have long since abandoned. When something breaks, analysts are left guessing which alerts matter and which can be ignored.

A true detection system behaves very differently. Like a well-designed assembly line, it is repeatable, measurable, and optimized for consistent output. Each component has a defined role, and every signal moves through a structured lifecycle from ingestion to response.

This shift in thinking — from individual alerts to detection as a system — is the foundation of modern security operations.

Measuring What Actually Matters

Once detection is viewed as a system, measurement becomes possible. Argus Defense evaluates detection programs using operational metrics that directly correlate to security outcomes.

Alert Volume is the most visible metric, but also one of the most misleading. High alert volume increases log storage and compute costs, but the real cost is human. Analysts overwhelmed with noise cannot investigate everything thoroughly, leading to missed threats and burnout.

True Positive Rate (TPR) measures how often detections correctly identify malicious activity. While improving TPR is critical, it cannot be pursued in isolation. A system with perfect TPR but low coverage still fails its mission.

False Negative Rate (FNR) is often invisible — and far more dangerous. Undetected compromise represents total mission failure. Reducing FNR requires active validation through threat hunting, adversarial simulation, and post-incident feedback, not just rule tuning.

Mean Time to Respond (MTTR) is where detection proves its value. Detection exists to enable action. If alerts do not lead to rapid containment, the system has failed regardless of how many detections fired.

These metrics provide leadership with something far more valuable than alert counts: operational confidence.

Detection in Depth

Just as Defense in Depth relies on layered security controls, effective detection relies on Detection in Depth. No single data source provides sufficient context to identify modern threats reliably.

Argus Defense builds detection systems that correlate signals across:

  • Endpoint activity

  • Identity and authentication events

  • Email telemetry

  • Cloud control plane activity

  • Network and SaaS behavior

By anchoring detections to attacker techniques and behaviors rather than atomic indicators of compromise, the system becomes resilient to threat churn. Attackers can rotate infrastructure and tools, but techniques — credential abuse, lateral movement, persistence — remain consistent.

This layered visibility ensures that failure in one sensor does not blind the security team entirely.

People and Process Are Part of the System

Detection is not purely a technology problem. It is a system where people, process, and tooling interact continuously.

Security Analysts are not passive consumers of alerts. They are integral components of the detection system. High-quality alerts, proper enrichment, and clear response paths enable analysts to provide meaningful feedback that drives tuning and improvement.

Threat Hunting acts as a less structured but equally important component. Argus Defense focuses hunting efforts on defined “hunting grounds” — systems, roles, and activities with elevated risk. These hunts convert low-fidelity signals into actionable intelligence and feed directly back into detection engineering.

Efficacy Testing ensures the system continues to function as designed. Detection logic must be tested with the same rigor as production code. This includes routine simulation of attacker techniques and periodic end-to-end testing that validates both automation and human response.

Together, these elements ensure the detection system evolves alongside the threat landscape rather than stagnating.

Aligning Detection With Business Risk

The most common failure of detection programs is misalignment with the business. Security teams often protect assets simply because they are easy to monitor, not because they are critical.

Argus Defense starts detection strategy by understanding how the organization operates:

  • How does it generate revenue or deliver services?

  • Which systems enable those outcomes?

  • Which roles have access to sensitive data or operational control?

  • What failures create measurable loss within defined timeframes?

Once these questions are answered, assets are categorized by risk tier. Tier 1 systems receive the highest level of detection coverage, enrichment, and response capability. Lower-risk systems are monitored appropriately without consuming disproportionate resources.

This approach ensures security effort is focused where failure matters most.

Compliance as a Floor, Not a Ceiling

Regulatory requirements often define minimum detection and logging expectations. While these requirements must be met, they should not dictate detection strategy entirely.

Argus Defense treats compliance as a baseline — not a driver of alert volume. Logging requirements do not always imply alerting requirements. Strategic detection programs meet regulatory intent while preserving analyst capacity for real threats.

When compliance is automated and integrated into the detection system, it becomes sustainable rather than burdensome.

The Foundation That Everything Builds On

A detection foundation that is systemic, measurable, and business-aligned becomes the platform for everything else: faster response, clearer reporting, and continuous improvement.

Organizations that invest in this foundation move from reactive security to controlled operations. They stop chasing alerts and start managing risk.

This is the philosophy that underpins every detection program Argus Defense builds — and it is the difference between having detections and having security.

Key Topics:

  • Detection Strategy

  • Detection Engineering

  • Security Operations

  • Detection in Depth

  • Security ROI

  • Business-Aligned Security