Detection Engineering vs. SIEM Rule Sprawl

Written By:

Jon Haas

Date:

Nov 19, 2025

As security programs mature, a familiar pattern emerges: the SIEM fills with hundreds or thousands of detection rules. Each rule was added with good intent—responding to a breach, satisfying an audit requirement, or following vendor guidance. Over time, however, this collection becomes unmanageable.

This is not detection engineering. It is rule sprawl.

Argus Defense distinguishes detection engineering as a disciplined engineering practice, not a reactive rule-writing exercise. Understanding the difference is critical for any organization seeking sustainable security operations.

The Illusion of Coverage

Rule count is often mistaken for detection coverage. Executives are told they are “well protected” because the SIEM contains thousands of detections. Analysts, however, experience something very different: duplicated logic, conflicting alerts, and fragile rules that break with minor environmental changes.

Rule sprawl creates an illusion of security while increasing operational risk. Each additional unmanaged rule increases maintenance overhead, alert noise, and the likelihood of blind spots.

True coverage is not measured by quantity—it is measured by intent.

What Detection Engineering Actually Means

Detection engineering is the systematic design, deployment, testing, and lifecycle management of detections aligned to attacker behavior and business risk.

At Argus Defense, detection engineering includes:

  • Defined detection objectives tied to attacker techniques

  • Standardized detection patterns reusable across environments

  • Version control, documentation, and ownership

  • Continuous testing and validation

This approach treats detections as production assets, not one-off configurations.

Behavioral Detections Over Atomic Indicators

One of the primary causes of rule sprawl is over-reliance on atomic indicators such as hashes, IP addresses, and domain names. These indicators change constantly and provide minimal longevity.

Detection engineering focuses on behavioral techniques:

  • Credential access and abuse

  • Persistence mechanisms

  • Lateral movement patterns

  • Privilege escalation workflows

By targeting how attackers operate rather than what they temporarily use, detections remain effective even as threats evolve.

Standardization and Reusability

Detection engineering borrows heavily from software engineering principles. Argus Defense builds standardized detection logic that can be adapted across customers and environments without rewriting entire rule sets.

This modular approach reduces:

  • Maintenance burden

  • Alert duplication

  • Configuration drift

It also allows detections to be tuned centrally while preserving local context.

Lifecycle Management

Unmanaged rules decay. Logs change, business processes evolve, and cloud services update APIs. Without ownership and review, detections silently fail.

Argus Defense assigns every detection a lifecycle:

  • Creation: Defined purpose and success criteria

  • Deployment: Controlled rollout with validation

  • Monitoring: Ongoing performance measurement

  • Tuning: Adjustments based on feedback

  • Retirement: Removal when no longer valuable

This lifecycle ensures the detection system remains healthy and relevant.

Measuring Detection Effectiveness

Detection engineering requires metrics that reflect reality. Argus Defense evaluates detections using:

  • True positive rate

  • Analyst investigation time

  • Coverage across the kill chain

  • Detection redundancy and overlap

These metrics replace vanity statistics like total rule count.

Executive Visibility

One of the most overlooked benefits of detection engineering is executive clarity. Instead of abstract metrics, leaders receive answers to critical questions:

  • What attacker techniques are we detecting?

  • Where are our gaps?

  • How quickly can we contain real threats?

This transparency builds confidence and supports informed risk decisions.

Scaling Without Collapse

Rule sprawl does not scale. Detection engineering does.

As organizations grow, adopt new technologies, or expand geographically, detection systems must adapt without collapsing under complexity. Detection engineering provides a framework that scales predictably while maintaining quality.

The Cost of Doing Nothing

Organizations that ignore rule sprawl pay for it eventually—through missed detections, analyst burnout, and prolonged incidents. Cleaning up years of unmanaged rules is far more expensive than building correctly from the start.

Detection as an Engineering Discipline

Detection engineering elevates security operations from reactive firefighting to a mature, resilient capability. It transforms the SOC from a cost center into a strategic function aligned with business outcomes.

At Argus Defense, we believe detection must be engineered with the same rigor as the systems it protects.

Key Topics:

  • Detection Engineering

  • SIEM Optimization

  • Rule Sprawl

  • Behavioral Detections

  • SOC Maturity

  • Security Architecture